Identifying and Overcoming the Top 7 Mistakes in Journal Article Writing

As a scholar, publishing your research in peer-reviewed academic journals can be a crucial step towards advancing your career and contributing to the scientific community. However, the publication process is often filled with challenges and obstacles, especially when it comes to avoiding common errors in journal articles. In this article, we will provide a guide to help you identify and avoid these top 7 mistakes so that your research can get the recognition it deserves.

Talking with an editor friend, we tried together to identify the 7 biggest errors made by authors. Then came the idea to write this article entitled “Identifying and Overcoming the Top 7 Mistakes in Journal Article Writing”.


As a writer, it’s essential to strive for excellence in every piece you produce. Whether you’re a seasoned author or just starting out, errors creep into your work and impact its overall quality.


Journal articles require a level of precision and attention to detail that sets them apart from other types of writing.


In this article, we’ll explore the Top 7 Mistakes in Journal Article to provide practical tips for avoiding and overcoming them. 



First Mistake: Lack of Clarity in Purpose and Objectives


One of the most significant errors in journal articles is a lack of clarity in purpose and objectives. Your article should have a clear and concise purpose that guides the reader through your argument.


This can be achieved by using a well-defined thesis statement, a clear research question, or a well-articulated problem statement.


Ensure that your objectives align with your research question or problem statement and are clearly stated in the introduction of your article.




Second Mistake: Inconsistent Writing Style


The inconsistent writing style is another common mistake in journal articles. To avoid this error, it’s important to choose a writing style that is appropriate for your audience and subject matter.


This includes consistency in tone, language, and formatting. Consider using a style guide, such as the APA or MLA, to ensure consistency throughout your article.




Third Mistake: Poor Organization and Flow


Poor organization and flow can greatly detract from the quality of your journal article. Ensure that your writing is well-organized, with clear and logical transitions between sections.


Additionally, consider the overall structure of your article, including the introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion. Each section should build upon the previous one to create a cohesive and compelling argument.




Forth Mistake: Inadequate Literature Review


An inadequate literature review can severely undermine the validity of your research. It’s essential to thoroughly research and review the existing literature on your topic to provide context for your study and to ensure that your findings are original and significant.


Ensure that your literature review is comprehensive and up-to-date and that it reflects a critical evaluation of the current state of research in your field.




Fifth Mistake: Inaccurate or Incomplete Data Analysis


Inaccurate or incomplete data analysis can greatly impact the validity of your findings. It’s important to ensure that your data is collected and analyzed correctly and that your results are reported accurately and comprehensively. Consider using statistical software or consulting with a statistical expert to ensure the validity of your data analysis.




Sixth Mistake: Inadequate Discussion and Interpretation of Results


The discussion and interpretation of your results are essential components of your journal article. This section should provide a thorough and critical evaluation of your findings, drawing upon relevant theories and previous research to contextualize your results.


Ensure that your discussion and interpretation are well-supported by your data and that you address any limitations or implications of your study.




Seventh Mistake: Poorly Written Conclusion


A poorly written conclusion can greatly detract from the overall quality of your journal article. Your conclusion should summarize the main findings of your study, provide a clear and concise summary of your research, and draw meaningful and original insights from your results. Consider linking your conclusion to your research question or problem statement, and provide practical implications for future research in your field.


Moreover, it’s critical to stay up to date with the latest developments in your field and to familiarize yourself with the guidelines and standards set forth by your target journal. By taking the time to understand the unique requirements and expectations of your audience, you can tailor your writing to meet their needs and produce articles that are engaging, informative, and well-received.




By following these tips, you can produce high-quality journal articles that are well-received by readers and have a positive impact on your professional reputation as a writer. Avoiding these Top 7 Mistakes in Journal Article writing requires a comprehensive approach that incorporates research, writing, and revision. 





Avoiding these Top 7 Mistakes in Journal Article requires a thorough and diligent approach to writing. Take the time to research and review the existing literature, ensure that your writing is well-organized and flows smoothly, and pay close attention to the accuracy and validity of your data analysis. 


It’s also important to seek feedback from peers and experienced authors to ensure that your writing is clear, concise, and free of errors. Consider enlisting the services of a professional editor or proofreader to review your work and provide constructive criticism. 


By being mindful of the most common errors and taking the steps necessary to avoid them, you can write articles that are of the highest quality and have a lasting impact on your readers. So, strive for excellence in your writing and take the time to produce articles that are well-written, well-researched, and well-received. If you do so, you can now submit your article by following the step-by-step guide that we explain in “Submitting yuour scientific article to an open journal system”.

Picture of Sergio Salles
Sergio Salles

More Insights

An imaginary conversation between Chomsky and ChatGPT: technology in the service of education or high-tech plagiarism?

Noam Chomsky is a world-renowned intellectual and linguist known for his contributions to the fields of linguistics, cognitive psychology, education, and political activism. In a recent interview, Noam Chomsky shared his thoughts on GPT-3 as a technological phenomenon that pertains to the current crisis in society and especially in contemporary education. In this paper, we imagine and test how GPT-3 itself, through ChatGPT, would “respond” to Chomsky’s philosophical judgments. To do this, as we did in another article, we will include the prompt with Chomsky’s reflection before GPT-3’s response.

Read More
The rise of ChatGPT and its impact on academic writing

In this article, we have decided to write in dialog with GPT-3 through ChatGPT so that you can understand the impacts to academic writing of using this new technology. Thus, all sections of the articles are divided into prompts with the response from GPT-3 in quotes. As you will see for yourself, there is an OpenAI policy geared towards academic use of the GPT-3 tool with ethical concerns regarding misuse and illegal uses.

Read More
The Expensive Nature of Academic Publishing: A Reflexion of the Financial Implications of Printing Academic Articles

Academic publishing is an essential part of the research and academic community, but it can also come with a high cost. In this article, we will explore the financial impact of academic publishing and discuss why the cost of academic publishing has become a major concern for researchers, universities, and funding agencies. Despite its importance, academic publishing can be a highly costly venture, involving various expenses from printing and distribution to manuscript preparation and peer review

Read More

You cannot copy content of this page

Need Help To publish?

Reach out to us today