frequently asked question
Frequently Asked Questions
We can tell you everything about publication
Create your content securely and quickly
everything you need to know before publishing your content
How to find the right journal for my content?
Researchers can use databases like Google Scholar, Directory of Open Acess Journals, Web of Science or Scopus to search for journals that match their research area and look for the impact factor and publication frequency of the journals they are interested in.
They can also consult their colleagues, mentors, or academic advisors to get recommendations and gather insights on their experiences with the selected journals.
How do I know the journal's impact factor and reputation before submitting my article?
The impact factor is a commonly used metric to measure the impact and quality of a journal, but it is just one of several factors to consider. Researchers should also consider the readership, scope and focus of the journal, as well as its editorial policies, publication history, and reputation in their field.
How to write a compelling article?
Writing a strong and well-structured article requires careful planning and attention to detail. Researchers should take their time to outline the key points and arguments of their research, and make sure the language is clear, concise and easy to understand. They should also aim to write an engaging and persuasive paper that captures the attention of the reader and clearly conveys the importance of their research. You can learn more about this in our article "Submitting Your Scientific Article To An Open Journal System: A Quick And Easy Guide"
What are the most important ethical considerations in scientific publishing?
Scientific publishing involves a number of ethical considerations, including plagiarism, conflict of interest, data manipulation and misuse, and authorship issues. Researchers should be aware of these issues and take appropriate measures to ensure that their research is conducted and published with integrity. Journals often publish their ethics and plagiarism policies so that potential authors take the necessary and sufficient steps to make sure that their manuscripts are ethically correct.
What should I do if my article is rejected by a journal?
Se o seu artigo for rejeitado, considere buscar feedback dos editores da revista para obter os motivos da rejeição. Tente reler as orientações para autores, os artigos já publicados em atenção ao feedback dos editores. Sempre revise seu artigo de acordo com as diretrizes da revista, mas não envie a mesma versão para a mesma revista sem antes revisá-la. Se a política da revista não indicar os motivos da reprovação, não se preocupe: você também pode considerar submeter seu artigo a outra revista que seja mais apropriada para sua pesquisa e onde as revisões sejam divulgadas aos autores sem identificação dos revisores.
How long does it typically take for an article to be indexed in Web of Science after being published in Telos' indexed journals?
The time it takes for an article published in a journal indexed in ESCI (Emerging Sources Citation Index) to appear in Web of Science can vary. In general, it can take from 8-10 weeks to several months for an article to be indexed by Web of Science after it has been published in a journal indexed in ESCI. Once the article has been indexed, it should appear in Web of Science search results. It is important to note that not all articles published in journals indexed in ESCI will be indexed by Web of Science, as Web of Science has specific inclusion criteria.
How can ChatGPT be used for academic publishing?
"ChatGPT can be a useful tool for academic publishing in several ways. Some of the ways ChatGPT can be used for academic publishing are: Generating summaries: ChatGPT can generate summaries of academic articles, making it easier for readers to understand the key points of a paper. Creating introductions: ChatGPT can generate introductions for academic papers, providing a useful starting point for authors who are struggling to get started with their writing. Checking grammar and syntax: ChatGPT can assist with checking grammar and syntax in academic papers, helping to ensure that papers are well-written and free of errors. Providing citation support: ChatGPT can assist with citation formatting, ensuring that papers conform to the appropriate citation style guidelines. Translation: ChatGPT can translate academic papers from one language to another, helping to expand the reach and impact of research. It is important to note that while ChatGPT can be a useful tool, it is not a substitute for careful and thoughtful writing and research. Authors should always carefully review and edit their work, and consult with colleagues and subject matter experts as needed to ensure the accuracy and quality of their research." (Chat-GPT, GPT 3.5, OpenAI.com)
Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science?
"Tools such as ChatGPT do not necessarily threaten transparent science, but they do present unique challenges and ethical considerations. On the one hand, tools like ChatGPT can be used to generate ideas and content, potentially accelerating the pace of scientific research and discovery. This can lead to greater transparency and collaboration, as well as increased accessibility of scientific knowledge. On the other hand, the use of LLMs like ChatGPT can also raise concerns about the quality and authenticity of research. It can be difficult to ensure that the use of LLMs is properly attributed and cited, and there is a risk that this type of technology could be used to generate text that is intentionally misleading or incorrect. To address these concerns, it is important for researchers to be transparent about their use of LLMs and other automated tools, and to take steps to ensure that their use is ethical and aligned with best practices in academic publishing. This may include providing proper attribution and citation for text generated by LLMs, conducting independent research to verify the accuracy of information generated by these tools, and being transparent about the limitations and potential biases of LLMs. Overall, while tools like ChatGPT can present challenges and ethical considerations, they also have the potential to enhance transparency and collaboration in science when used responsibly and ethically." (Chat-GPT, GPT 3.5, OpenAI.com)
How can editors and reviewers identify the use of LLMs like ChatGPT in manuscripts without proper identification of their use?
"Identifying the use of LLMs like ChatGPT in manuscripts without proper identification of their use can be challenging for editors and reviewers, but there are several strategies that can be used to help detect the use of these tools. Here are some ways that editors and reviewers can identify the use of LLMs like ChatGPT in manuscripts: Review the quality of writing: Editors and reviewers can review the quality of writing in the manuscript to identify any inconsistencies or differences in writing style that may indicate the use of LLMs. This can include differences in language, syntax, and vocabulary. Check for accuracy: Editors and reviewers can check the accuracy and consistency of information presented in the manuscript to ensure that it matches up with existing research and knowledge in the field. If the information presented seems too advanced or simplistic for the author's stated expertise, this may indicate the use of LLMs. Use plagiarism detection software: Editors and reviewers can use plagiarism detection software to check the manuscript for potential instances of plagiarism or misattribution. This can help identify any text that has been generated by LLMs without proper attribution or citation. Request access to data and methods: Editors and reviewers can request access to the data and methods used to create the manuscript. This can help to identify any use of LLMs or other automated tools in the creation of the manuscript. Ask authors directly: Editors and reviewers can ask authors directly if they have used LLMs like ChatGPT in the creation of their manuscript. While this approach may not always be effective, it can help to promote transparency and accountability among authors. It is important for editors and reviewers to be diligent in their review of manuscripts to ensure that they are original, accurate, and well-researched. The use of LLMs can present unique challenges, but with careful attention and consideration, editors and reviewers can help to maintain the integrity and quality of academic publishing." (Chat-GPT, GPT 3.5, OpenAI.com)
How does the peer review process work and what feedback will I receive from the publisher?
Understanding the peer review process is crucial in preparing a high-quality article that will be accepted for publication. Researchers should be aware of the expected standards and requirements of their selected journal and make sure their research is well-structured, well-researched, and well-written.
How can I best use my time to complete the research and writing process?
Publishing a scientific paper can be a time-consuming process, so it's important to plan ahead and prioritize your work effectively. Researchers should allow themselves enough time to complete their research, write their paper, and make revisions, while also leaving time for other important activities like teaching or professional development. To assist you in building your article, you can also use project management software with time markers and a schedule.
What are the lenght and format of scientific articles?
Most indexed journals have specific guidelines for the length and format of the articles they publish. Researchers should make sure they understand these requirements and follow them closely to avoid having their paper rejected for not meeting the criteria. This includes having appropriate figures and tables, and making sure the paper is properly formatted and styled. Journals usually publish the required size and format of articles in guidelines to authors. Thus, it is recommended to consult directly the page with the guidelines to authors and, if the doubt persists, to the editorial team.
How long does the peer-review process typically take?
Peer review is a quality control process used by academic journals to evaluate the accuracy, clarity, and significance of submitted articles. After submitting an article, it is reviewed by experts in the relevant field who assess the article's quality and provide feedback to the author. The length of time for peer review can vary depending on the journal and the field of study. The process can take several weeks to several months. In Telos journals, we try to deliver our reviewers' opinion within two months.
How long should authors expect to wait before their articles appear in Google Scholar after being published in Telos' indexed journal?
The time it takes for an article published in OJS (Open Journal Systems) to appear in Google Scholar can vary from 4-6 weeks to months. In our Telos journals published with OJS, we use an automatic indexing plugin, in order to assist Google Scholar in the indexing process that does not depend on the journal editors, but is performed automatically by Google Scholar.
Can ChatGPT be an author of an academic or scientific publication?
"Technically, ChatGPT can be listed as an author of a publication, as it is capable of generating text and content that can be used in academic writing. However, it is important to note that academic publishing typically requires contributions from human authors who have conducted research, analyzed data, and interpreted results. While ChatGPT can assist with certain aspects of academic writing, it is not capable of conducting research or providing original insights or ideas. In addition, many academic journals have strict authorship guidelines and requirements, which often require that authors have made a significant intellectual contribution to the research being reported. Given these guidelines and requirements, it is unlikely that ChatGPT would be listed as a sole or primary author of a publication in an academic journal. However, it is possible that ChatGPT could be acknowledged for its contributions to the writing process, particularly in cases where it has assisted with the formatting, editing, or translation of a paper. Ultimately, the decision to list ChatGPT as an author or contributor would be up to the discretion of the individual author(s) and the specific journal's authorship guidelines." (Chat-GPT, GPT 3.5, OpenAI.com)
What are the current software or websites that can identify the use of LLMs like ChatGPT?
"Currently, there are several software and websites that can be used to identify the use of LLMs like ChatGPT in written work. Here are some examples: Plagiarism detection software: Many plagiarism detection tools, such as Turnitin and iThenticate, can identify text that has been generated by LLMs. These tools compare the text in a submitted work to a large database of existing text to identify instances of potential plagiarism or misattribution. AI-generated text detection tools: There are also several tools specifically designed to identify text that has been generated by LLMs. Some examples of these tools include GPT-3 Detector and Grover. Language analysis tools: Language analysis tools, such as Grammarly and ProWritingAid, can be used to identify inconsistencies in writing style or vocabulary that may indicate the use of LLMs. Expert review: In some cases, experts in a specific field may be able to identify the use of LLMs based on their familiarity with the subject matter and the writing style of the manuscript. It is important to note that these tools are not foolproof and may not be able to detect all instances of LLM-generated text. However, they can be a useful starting point for identifying potential issues and ensuring that written work is original, accurate, and free of plagiarism." (Chat-GPT, GPT 3.5, OpenAI.com)
How can someone avoid plagiarism with GPT-3 and ChatGPT?
"To avoid plagiarism with GPT-3 and ChatGPT, it is important to use these tools as a means of generating ideas and content, rather than as a replacement for original thought and research. Here are some tips for avoiding plagiarism when using GPT-3 and ChatGPT: Use the tools for inspiration: GPT-3 and ChatGPT can be a useful starting point for generating ideas and content, but they should not be used to replace original research or writing. Use the tools to help spark ideas, but be sure to build on those ideas with your own research and insights. Attribute sources: If you do use content generated by GPT-3 or ChatGPT in your writing, be sure to attribute the source appropriately. This means citing the tool and the specific text generated by the tool in your references or footnotes. Use plagiarism detection software: Before submitting any work, use plagiarism detection software to check for instances of plagiarism. This can help identify any instances where you may have inadvertently used text generated by GPT-3 or ChatGPT without attribution. Understand fair use: When using GPT-3 or ChatGPT, it is important to understand the principles of fair use, which allow for the use of limited portions of copyrighted material for certain purposes, such as criticism, commentary, or research. Be sure to only use content generated by the tools in ways that are consistent with fair use guidelines. Be transparent: When using GPT-3 or ChatGPT, be transparent about the role of these tools in your research and writing. Explain how you used the tools and what specific contributions they made to your work. This can help prevent misunderstandings and allegations of plagiarism." (Chat-GPT, GPT 3.5, OpenAI.com)
Some cool tips you should know before publishing
01.
Browse journals that use the OJS/PKP system first
Open access journals offer a number of benefits, including increased visibility, accessibility, and impact. However, many open access journals also charge publication fees, which can be a barrier for some researchers. Researchers should consider their budget and funding sources when choosing a journal, and look for alternatives like institutional repositories or funding programs to help cover the cost of publishing.
02.
Always consult your publication copyright
Researchers should understand the copyright and distribution rights associated with their research and make sure they retain the rights they need to share and reuse their work. They should also familiarize themselves with the policies of their selected journal and make sure they are comfortable with the terms and conditions of publication. Try to prioritize journals that publish their articles with a Creative Commons license.
03.
Always read the guidelines for authors
Most indexed journals have specific formatting and style requirements, including font size, margins, headings, and citation styles. Researchers should carefully review these guidelines and follow them closely to ensure their paper meets the standards of their selected journal.
04.
Think strategically about your publications as part of your portfolio
Publishing in a reputable and high-quality indexed journal can have a positive impact on the professional reputation and future prospects of researchers. However, it's important to remember that publishing is just one aspect of a successful academic career, and researchers should focus on their overall research portfolio and impact, rather than just the number of publications they produce.
05.
Publishing is not always the same as having an impact
If your goal is to pass a public examination or tender in which the greatest weight will be given to the number of articles published and not to impact factors, then you can and should prioritize journals with adequate focus and scope without worrying so much about impact factors national (as is the case in Brazil of Qualis/CAPES) or international (ISI, JCR, etc.) qualifying indexes. This view will only be invalid when the edict of the exam or public competition explicitly includes the impact factor to measure the candidate's production.
"Published ideas are like wings that no one can stop their flight"
Here at Telos we usually reiterate the value and transcendent meaning of the above phrase as part of our motto and mission.