Abstract
Written in the twelfth century by the monk Gratian, the work Concordia Discordantium Canonum, known as Decretum Gratiani, was until the beginning of the twentieth century the reference for canon law and for the understanding of medieval and modern legal-philosophical thought derived from it. Emerged after the Gregorian reform, it will present the law divided between law/natural law and custom, human law. Exposing Graciano's theory of natural law, this work also points out how the Bolognese jurist will relate natural law to the golden rule, or regula dilectionis proximi. By linking the natural law to the golden maxim, Graciano inserts himself as a continuator of a tradition originated from the Greco-Roman philosophy, embraced by the patristic and developed by the scholastics.
References
ALVES, José Carlos Moreira. Direito Romano. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Forense, 2021.
ARISTÓTELES. Retórica. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional-Casa da Moeda, 2005
BERMAN, Harold. Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983.
CABRAL, João Francisco Pereira. A dicotomia nómos-phýsis no crátilo de Platão. Revista E. F.e H. da Antiguidade, Campinas, n. 26, Julho 2009/Junho 2013, p. 111-129.
CALASSO, Francesco. Medio Evo del Diritto. V. 1. Milano: Giuffrè, 1954.
CÍCERO. Da República. Brasília: Senado Federal, Conselho Editorial, 2019.
CONTE, Emanuele. La fuerza del texto: Casuística y categorías del derecho medieval. Ed. de M. Madero. Madrid: Universidad Carlos III, 2016.
COPUS JURIS CIVILIS. Vol. I: Institutiones; Digesta. Editio stereotypa quinta. Berlin, 1889.
DECRETUM MAGISTRI GRATIANI. In: CORPUS IURIS CANONICI. Editio lipsiensis secunda post Aemilii Ludouici Richteri curas. Pars Prior. Graz: Akademische Druck – U. Verlegsanstalt, 1959.
GROSSI, Paolo. A ordem jurídica medieval. São Paulo: Editora WMF Martins Fontes, 2014.
GUTIERREZ J., Alberto. Gregório VII y el renacimiento de la cristiandad medieval. Universitas humanística, Vol. 24, n. 24, 1985, p. 159-165.
LE GOFF, Jacques; SCHMITT, Jean-Claude. Dicionário analítico do Ocidente medieval. 2 vol. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2017.
MARTÍNEZ, Faustino Martínez. Sobre la noción de derecho natural en Graciano. Foro, Nueva época, núm. 00/2004, p. 237-267.
PENNINGTON, Kenneth. Lex Naturalis and Jus Naturalis. The Jurist, n. 68, 2008, p. 569-591.
PINEDO, Pablo. Decretum Gratiani: Dictum Gratiani. Ius canonicum, vol. 2, n. 3, 1962, p. 149-166.
REINER, Hans. Duty and Inclination: The Fundamentals of Morality Discussed and Redefined with Special Regard to Kant and Schiller. Phaenomenologica 93. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1983.
ROESLER, Claudia Rosane. A estabilização do direito canônico e o decreto de Graciano. Revista Sequência, n. 49, dez. 2004, p. 9-32.
SAN ISIDORO DE SEVILLA. Etimologías. Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos, 2004.
TOMÁS DE AQUINO. Suma Teológica. São Paulo: Edições Loyola, 2005.
SANTANA, Luiz Joaquim; Elimar Szaniawski. O direito natural em Roma. Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR, v. 24, 1987, p. 43-55.
TIERNEY, Brian. Origins of natural rights language: texts and contexts, 1150-1250. History of Political Thought, Vol. 10, No. 4 (Winter 1989), pp. 615-646.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences